When comparing mini PC performance between the Beelink S13 and GMKtec G3, users must consider their specific workflow requirements. The Beelink Mini S13 (Intel N150/N100) and GMKtec G3 (Intel N95/N5095) cater to different user needs through distinct hardware configurations. While both devices occupy the compact computing space, their performance profiles diverge significantly under sustained workloads.
The N150/N100 in Beelink S13 use Intel’s Twin Lake architecture with 6W TDP, featuring Intel UHD Graphics (16EU). GMKtec G3’s N95/N5095 utilize older Jasper Lake designs with 15W TDP. Benchmark tests show the N100 outperforms N5095 by 23% in multicore tasks while consuming 40% less power, making the S13 more efficient for prolonged use scenarios.
The architectural improvements in Twin Lake processors introduce several advantages. Intel’s refined 10nm SuperFin process in the N100 allows higher clock speeds (3.4GHz boost vs 2.9GHz on N5095) without increasing thermal output. This efficiency translates to better performance in CPU-bound tasks like video transcoding and data compression. The newer UHD Graphics architecture also brings support for AV1 hardware decoding, a crucial feature for modern streaming platforms. Memory controller enhancements enable the S13 to handle faster DDR4-3200 memory compared to the G3’s maximum DDR4-2933 support, resulting in 12-15% better memory bandwidth utilization.
| Feature | Beelink S13 (N100) | GMKtec G3 (N5095) |
|---|---|---|
| Process Node | 10nm SuperFin | 10nm |
| Max Turbo Frequency | 3.4GHz | 2.9GHz |
| GPU Execution Units | 24 EU | 16 EU |
How Do Connectivity Options Compare Between Models?
Beelink S13 features dual HDMI 2.0 ports, USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C, and 2.5G Ethernet. GMKtec G3 counters with triple display support (HDMI+DP+USB-C video) but slower 1G Ethernet. Wireless connectivity favors the S13 with Wi-Fi 6 vs G3’s Wi-Fi 5. Both include multiple USB ports, but S13 offers faster data transfer through its USB 3.2 Gen2 implementation.
Connectivity differences directly impact user experience across various scenarios. The S13’s dual HDMI 2.0 ports support 4K displays at 60Hz simultaneously, ideal for financial traders or content creators needing high-resolution screen real estate. Its USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C port delivers 10Gbps transfer speeds, enabling rapid data backups to external NVMe drives. The 2.5G Ethernet port proves valuable for network-attached storage users, offering 250% faster wired network speeds than the G3’s legacy Gigabit port. Conversely, the G3’s DisplayPort output provides better compatibility with professional monitors, while its USB-C video support allows daisy-chaining multiple displays through a single cable connection.
| Port Type | Beelink S13 | GMKtec G3 |
|---|---|---|
| USB 3.2 Gen2 | 1x Type-C | None |
| Video Outputs | 2x HDMI 2.0 | HDMI/DP/USB-C |
| Ethernet | 2.5GbE | 1GbE |
How Do Thermal Management Systems Differ?
Beelink employs a copper heat pipe + aluminum fin stack with 25CFM fan, maintaining CPU temps below 75°C under load. GMKtec G3 uses basic aluminum block cooling hitting 89°C in stress tests. Noise levels favor S13 (28dB max) vs G3’s 35dB. The S13’s dual ventilation design enables better sustained performance without thermal throttling.
What Are the Power Efficiency Comparisons?
Under identical workloads, S13 (N100) consumes 8W vs G3’s 12W (N5095). Battery-powered scenarios show S13 lasting 2.1 hours longer than G3 using same 65W PD power bank. The N100’s 6W base TDP vs N5095’s 15W explains the efficiency gap. GMKtec’s higher power draw impacts long-term electricity costs in 24/7 operation scenarios.
Which Model Delivers Better Value for Money?
At $229 (16GB/500GB), Beelink S13 costs 18% more than GMKtec G3’s $189 base model. However, S13 includes Windows 11 Pro license ($139 value) vs G3’s barebones Linux setup. Factoring in upgrade costs, S13 becomes cheaper for ready-to-use Windows systems. G3 appeals more to Linux enthusiasts willing to customize their OS environment.
Expert Views
“While both mini PCs serve the compact computing market, their architectural differences create distinct user propositions,” says tech analyst Michael Chen. “The Beelink S13 is essentially a micro desktop replacement, whereas GMKtec G3 functions better as an embedded system. Buyers should prioritize the S13 for Windows-based productivity but consider G3 for Linux-based kiosk/digital signage applications where cost dominates decision-making.”
Conclusion
The Beelink Mini S13 emerges as the superior choice for most users needing Windows-based productivity, offering better performance, cooling, and expansion. However, GMKtec G3 remains viable for budget-focused Linux users or specific low-power applications. Your decision ultimately hinges on OS preference, upgrade needs, and willingness to invest in long-term computing efficiency.
FAQs
- Can either mini PC handle 4K video playback?
- Both support 4K@60Hz output, but S13 decodes AV1 codec more efficiently.
- Which device runs cooler during gaming?
- Beelink S13 maintains 10°C lower temps during GPU-intensive tasks.
- Are these compatible with USB-C docking stations?
- S13 fully supports Thunderbolt 4 docks; G3 only basic USB-C DP alt mode.